We bring together information on the legal frameworks for the right to information from more than 100 countries.
You are here: Home Cases Cardenas v. Mayor of Huamanga

Cardenas v. Mayor of Huamanga

last modified Aug 21, 2012 01:56 PM

Case number:
Date of decision:
20 January 2011
Court / Arbiter:
Supreme Court of Ayacucho, unreviewable ( Appellate )


The city must deliver information related to the travel, and travel expenses, of public officials as supported by the principle of publicity and the right to access information.

Budget information
Costs / Fees
Mute refusal (including tacit refusal, failure to respond)
Open government principles (including accountability, anti-corruption, democracy, participation in government, transparency)
Other law (non-RTI)
RTI law
Sub-national government bodies (including municipal, state, provincial)

Case details:


Mario Cueto Cárdenas, a journalist, requested from the General Secretary of the City Council of Huamanga all information related to trips approved and taken by public officials to other cities within and outside the country, including dates, purpose and money allocated per diem (pg. 1,3). After receiving no response from the Mayor or City Council, a demand of habeas data (i.e. an individual complaint based on a fundamental right to know information stored about oneself) was filed with the court of first instance, which dismissed the demand. Cárdenas appealed the decision (pg. 1-2).


The Court overturned the decision of the lower court, ruling that the city must deliver certified copies of the information requested once the applicable fee payment had been received by the requester (pg. 4). The Court’s reasoning was based on (1) the principle of publicity, (2) the right to access information (as protected by the Law on Transparency and Access to Information), and (3) Law 27619 which regulates foreign travel authorization of public servants and officials (pg. 2-3). First, all information possessed by the state is governed by the principle of publicity, which obligates government bodies to produce and keep information related to the travels and expenses of their officials (pg. 2). Second, the right to access information is explicitly embedded in the statutory law of Peru. Third, Law 27619 provides for the documentation and retention of all information needed to satisfy such travel requests (pg. 3). The Court ordered delivery of the requested information as soon as the requisite fee had been paid and warned that continuation of such failures to provide information could result in further corrective action (pg. 4).


Judgment of the Court.